<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>2</title>
<title_fa>1</title_fa>
<short_title>3</short_title>
<subject>Literature &amp; Humanities</subject>
<web_url>http://safinah-al-nejat.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>1</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>admin</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>9</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>10</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii>8</journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>7</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid>14</journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai>8888</journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science>13</journal_id_science>
<language>fa</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1402</year>
	<month>10</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2024</year>
	<month>1</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>9</volume>
<number>33</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>IMPULSES IN THE LEGACY OF ATHEISM; A CRITIQUE OF ANTONY FLEW’S ATHEISTIC APPROACH</title>
	<subject_fa>تخصصي</subject_fa>
	<subject>Special</subject>
	<content_type_fa>پژوهشي</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Research</content_type>
	<abstract_fa></abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:17.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Calibri&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;serif&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;Atheism is considered a legacy of the new era.Hume is considered the beginning of this legacy.Despite his fifty years of atheism, Antony Flew has shaken the structure of this heritage by raising questions about the suffering of this approach and has spoken about the possibility of the existence of God.His questions regarding the questioning of the claimants of atheism cannot be considered only as violations or forms and the possibility of rejection, the impulse that he raised by asking about the possibility of the existence of God based on the foundations of science in the future era produced three results:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;serif&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:17.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Calibri&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;serif&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:17.0pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Calibri&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;serif&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;First, creating a fundamental hole in Hume&amp;#39;s claims and atheism;Second, the possibility of re-examining the claims of atheism and re-reading the arguments of atheists and criticizing and criticizing it and the possibility of the violations and objections being unsubstantiated;Thirdly, returning to the correct and accurate reading of the arguments of the theists in proving the existence of an intelligent principle in the creation of the world, the main idea of the present article is, firstly, the approach and period of the first view of Flew about the impossibility of positive proof of theism has been analyzed, then the three achievements of the theoretical impulses have been analyzed.The legacy of atheism should be explained and at the end of his main thought in the second period of thought to be examined and analyzed.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:&amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;serif&amp;quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>atheism, proofs, theism of Antony Flo, legacy of atheism</keyword>
	<start_page>0</start_page>
	<end_page>0</end_page>
	<web_url>http://safinah-al-nejat.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-371&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name></first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Ensiyeh Hemmati / Qasem Pour-Hasan / Mohammad Safehiyan </last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email></email>
	<code>1003194753284600370</code>
	<orcid>1003194753284600370</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation></affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
